(1) “Being Analog” (formerly published as Chapter 7 of The Invisible Computer) by Donald Norman (1997) www.jnd.org/dn.mss/being_analog.html ;(2) ” A Short History Of the Internet” from The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction (February 1993), w3.aces.uiuc.edu/AIM/scale/nethistory.html

“Human beings are the results of millions of years of evolution, where the guiding principle was survival of the species, not efficient, algorithmic computation. ” -Don Norman

We can blame technology, once again, for all our problems. It’s humans that have sophisticated deception abilities, the masters of artifacts (learning from history) and an error-tolerant computing system. It’s only the interference of the rigid mechanical memory of machines that cause enormous misunderstandings and a new post-modern frustration. We have to learn new ways to manipulate our machines to find meaning and importance in our lives. Like the movie, Terminator,only the roles are reversed. We have to blend in– learn little phrases, equivalent to the digital “hasta la vista, baby.” Technology has vastly transformed the way we interact with other human beings. Wars have gone beyond human capabilities, making political strife a true guessing game on who has the old maid (aka. WMDs). Knowledge has gone beyond human capabilities–increased education requirements because of the exponential knowledge (and need for knowledge?). A new idea of efficiency, modeled after new technology has led to the dehumanization of the worker (efficiency= no deviation).

“The technology should conform to the people, not people to the technology” (Norman).

Another movie reference: Why was the clone army superior to the droid army in the Star Wars Saga? People think. They are flexible and creative. A beautiful marriage is formed with people and machines: it’s called the Internet. It is decentralized and has evolved. It wasn’t built in a day. It evolved and conformed to the needs of its fellow man. Bruce Sterling asks, “Why do people want to be ‘on the Internet?’ One of the main reasons is simple freedom. The Internet is a rare example of a true, modern, functional anarchy.”

As technology has developed, people have adapted to it, learning its codes and being limited by its abilities. I think, for the first time, technology has… “learned” (?) something from humans. The Internet’s constantly evolving structure of communication and interaction is a sign of human beings making technology work for them and not the other way around. As Don Norman’s mantra goes: Could this have been predicted beforehand? Maybe. But, it wasn’t.

Questions:
1) How has the creation of email and instant messaging affected the way that you talk to your friends and family? Does this technology help or hinder personal communication?

2)What is the relationship between the user of a calculator and the calculator? How does that compare with the relationship between the Internet and its user?

3) Considering Don Norman’s example of the rotating naval staff, how does this concept play a role in technology’s innovative qualities?

Posted in

5 responses to “My Name is Anna Log”

  1. megank22 Avatar
    megank22

    I would love to talk to the makers of the first Internet to see what they could have predicted and on the other hand never would have imagined for the Internet of today. I agree that we are going to have to be the ones who continue doing the adapting.

  2. madmoy Avatar
    madmoy

    Regarding question #1:

    Not too long ago, text messaging was just for trivial messages. Now I’m getting more and more important news from friends and family by text. I’ve learned about births, engagements, new jobs, vice presidential picks, etc. While I like the immediacy of getting such info by text, I find it a little weird. Doesn’t such important news warrant something a little more substantial communication? Or is it just important to get it out there to as many people as possible? I want to have more connection and actually talk to the person with the news.

  3. bocretio Avatar
    bocretio

    According to Dave Chalmers, in an introduction to the book “Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension” by Andy Clark, the calculator may just be a part of the user’s mind.
    Personally, I think that the calculator is more of a crutch. It may well allow for more room in the noggin for other knowledge, but at the same time it is representative of the erosion of foundational knowledge that it takes to use the calculator properly.

  4. katikati Avatar
    katikati

    I agree that technology makes certain muscles shrivel because the lack of practice. Who knows, soon maybe verbal language will die out in favor of text.

  5. […] of note:  Katarina, Quoc, Rylan,  Shane,  […]

Leave a comment