We watched the shower scene of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho today. That’s just the kind of teacher we have.
Art Collective
Here’s a component of my final for my Illustrator class. This will be a part of the motif for the event, whose ephemera I have to design. (Not to mention, make up an event.)
Update 11-21:
Here’s the logo for the imaginary venue.
Where I got this font…
Update 11-22: I reread the assignment and it turns out I need to make the logo using Illustrator tools, so this is out, but I will probably use it for something… maybe.
Today, I learned how to use the perspective grid. As you can see, I still haven’t mastered the customizable swatch skill, but I like the surreality of the end result. I realize in the future, I should expand the shapes in the grids and walls before slapping them into perspective. I used a drawing from the internet to get the architecture of this, but I had to add stairs, otherwise how will people get into my awesome house?
The most elevenly moment of my insignificant life was spent watching this demigod/demagogue celebrate the occasion with a quote from Kurt Vonnegut and a song that mentions Now and Laters and coffee percolators. I’m still processing the show like a good dream laden with these moments where time paused and everything floated.
Update 11-22 (I swear I didn’t plan to update it eleven days later):
I made this postcard to send to the Webleyman to express my gratitude for all the past/future inspiration.
Claire’s critique yesterday left everyone with something to think about. Some common ailments included: low contrast, bad paper choice, slightly awkward compositions and abstraction to the point of obscurity. She had little bits of editing advice that she said that we could do on the computer, to push the pieces a little further towards the ideal. This was my edit: the mountains needed more perspective, otherwise it becomes a little too dark and indiscernible as mountains.
Some cool and interesting things around that critique space. I was amazed at everyone’s different approaches. I received a few compliments, but after looking at Scott’s idea-heavy work (which baffled me for some time) I felt some art-envy. Everyone feels that a little bit when they see something that is out of their skill set or attention span or something genius that they wish they thought of first. There was some op-art-esque approaches and some heavy blocky iconic looking stuff where you just looked and looked because the stark contrast of the black and white shapes was just so pleasing, even if you didn’t get the artist’s statement about how time affects water.
What I enjoyed most was seeing the finished pieces of my “pod.” Last week, we presented to each other (in our little 4-5 table groups) our preliminary ideas. There was an overlap in sketches. Everyone had a little figure falling off of something, broken clocks, and brain doodles. But, each person with their own interpretation of the article (I thought it was morbid, but Michael thought it was funny) and ran with the concepts that reflected that and lo and behold we have twenty five illustrative points of view. I love the transformation of a sketch into something real and finished. The sketch almost seems like a premonition of the future.
I had a few sketches that didn’t make it to become something finished, for me. But, I saw the ideas that I thought I couldn’t do in other people’s work beautifully executed and it just goes to show that there is always art in the ideas just like an expert scrabble player finds words in a tile rack you thought had no good plays. It’s encouraging that if you sit and really give a concept thought, there’s a way to make it work and not only work but enchant people.